UCLA Protests: The Real Cost of Activist Performances on Campus

To the Brain-Dead Morons Trying to Sue People for Defending Themselves,

The public dissemination of the referenced lawsuit on your website, peoplevucla.com, constitutes a serious violation of the privacy rights of the individuals named therein. Specifically, this action is in direct violation of the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), including Section 1798.100, and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), specifically Article 17, which guarantees the “Right to Erasure” (commonly known as the “Right to be Forgotten”).

Your publication of personal names and identifying details has facilitated unwarranted public exposure, harassment, and reputational harm. This was done without consent and places the individuals involved at significant personal and professional risk.

Additionally, your legal filing lacks merit and demonstrates a blatant disregard for context and applicable law. The individuals named in your case were not engaged in lawful conduct—they violated several California statutes, including but not limited to:

• Penal Code § 407 – Unlawful Assembly
• Penal Code § 415 – Disturbing the Peace
• Penal Code § 602 – Trespassing
• Penal Code § 594 – Vandalism and Defacement of Property
• Penal Code § 647c – Obstruction of Public Ways

Let’s not pretend you don’t know what actually happened. You do understand that individuals are receiving prison sentences of up to 20 years for acts of vandalism tied to these protests, right? So let’s cut the martyr act. Who’s paying for the extensive damages to the UCLA campus caused by your clients? Who’s covering the cost of private security, cleanup, repairs, and the logistical nightmare your actions caused for law enforcement, emergency services, and the public? What about the traffic disruptions, the chaos, and the complete disregard for public safety?

Your clients defaced university property, spray-painted buildings, ripped down signs, destroyed fencing, and turned UCLA into a squatters’ encampment with tents and trash left behind like some failed music festival for angry trust fund kids. The school grounds were desecrated. Private and public areas were vandalized. Tents and debris were abandoned across the campus, forcing university staff and contractors to spend weeks cleaning up your mess—while you idiots filed lawsuits acting like you’re the victims.

And now you expect sympathy? No. Now we get justice.

And here’s where your stunning stupidity really shines: you’ve now made it so these so-called “attorneys” representing criminals are legally and financially responsible for the destruction caused to UCLA. So congrats. You just put a target on your own backs. I’ve already submitted a formal request to the District Attorney to investigate and prosecute these legal bottom-feeders for enabling and covering for the property damage, public disruption, and overall havoc their clients unleashed. And if UCLA itself refuses to take a stand and go after these attorneys, then we’ll take that as clear proof that the university supports its own destruction. Silence is complicity. Either they act, or they expose themselves.

We hereby demand the immediate removal or full redaction of all personal names from the lawsuit and your website. Should you fail to comply, we are prepared to initiate legal action, including a countersuit for violation of privacy rights, reputational damage, emotional distress, and any other harm resulting from your reckless publication.

Furthermore, formal complaints will be submitted to the California State Bar against each involved attorney and their respective firms. Pursuing baseless litigation under the guise of political activism is not only unethical—it’s borderline malicious.

This is your first and final warning. Immediate action is required. The continued display of this information is not only unlawful—it is dangerous. Should any individual be harmed as a result of your conduct, liability will fall squarely on you. We strongly suggest you hire private security immediately. We will not only hold you accountable—we will bill you for the security measures made necessary by your irresponsibility.

And yes—we are in direct contact with federal authorities, including the U.S. Secret Service. If your firm is acting on behalf of, or in coordination with, individuals or groups connected to extremist ideologies or terror-related causes, you can expect the full weight of legal scrutiny. This is not a political issue. This is a matter of public safety, national security, and basic human decency.

Let me make one thing absolutely clear—I was there. I saw what your people did with my own eyes. And no, we’re not scared of you. Don’t bring your circus back to our city with that imported chaos. We’re already fighting to clean this place up—we got Gascon out, and we’re damn tired of dealing with the fallout of people voting in trash like Newsom and Karen Bass. This community is done with political cosplay and activist parasites.

Your opinions aren’t popular here. What we want is peace, and now you want to punish people for defending themselves? For protecting their homes, their children, their faith, and their communities? That’s not happening. Not here.

We’re rich, we’re well-connected, and more importantly—we stick together. That’s why we win. We spend time with our families every Friday night while you’re out rage-posting and screaming into microphones. You’re not stronger than us. You’re not smarter than us. And you sure as hell aren’t going to overpower us with a bunch of rookie attorneys who probably just figured out how to pass the bar using Reddit and caffeine pills.

You want a fight? You’ll get steamrolled. We have the money, the influence, and the legal firepower to turn your world inside out. So think long and hard before coming after people who were simply defending their ground.